add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube

Comments (Continued)

  • 29 months ago
  • 4 points

The ps4 pro is not even close to having a 470. It gets beaten by a g4560 and a 1050ti. Even the 1050 would do better.

  • 29 months ago
  • 0 points

No, it's an rx 480 downclocked to around 470 levels in performance. The 470 and pro stomp on both the 1050 and 1050ti. I think you drastically underestimate the pro's power.

  • 29 months ago
  • 1 point

No. You are wrong. Take a look at this video proving the 1050 kicks the crap out of the ps4. And all thye games look better on the 1050. And it is cheaper to build a system with a 1050.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALoG2n-JSuc

Skip to 2 minute mark to see the benchmarks.

The ps4 pro can't even play one of the games at 1080p. The 1050 wins hands down.

  • 29 months ago
  • 1 point

On the hardware level he is right, it has as many shaders as an rx 480. Also some games only use half the GPU, because they don't support boost mode. Also boost mode doesn't increase the resolution and AC: Unity is likely CPU bound. Still the 1050 wins in all the PC ports.

  • 29 months ago
  • 0 points

the ps4 pro isn't beaten by a 1050, but it is by a 470. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yJUNyOS95o

  • 29 months ago
  • 3 points

This guy did not do any research. The ps4 pro upscales 1080p to 4k and 1440p. It does not render many games at native 4k. So the 1050 does beat it. Even then the game looks better on the 1050 anyway and is running at a much higher frame rate. On skyrim even though the ps4 pro ran better, It looked better on the 1050. So if you were to drop it to low instead of medium you would have similar looking game but it would be running better on the 1050. The fact that vsync was locked at 30 fps for the pc is stupid. The 470 could run skyrim 4k native 60 fps. That is why the framerate was so stable. On all the games the guy in the video played it looked better on the 1050 or was equal. But the system with the 1050 was crappy for the price.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALoG2n-JSuc

This guy built a better system for $350 ish.

Skip to 2 minutes in for the benchmarks.

  • 28 months ago
  • 1 point

good video, thx for the reply.

Sort

add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube