add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube

Comments

Comments

Comment reply on pckrrr's Completed Build: 2020 Ascending

  • 3 months ago
  • 1 point

It's 1440p ultrawide. Different than 4k.

Comment reply on pckrrr's Completed Build: 2020 Ascending

  • 3 months ago
  • 0 points

Why only 60 hz? Seems like a waste of those powerful parts.

Comment reply on projectnet's Completed Build: Efficient Build

  • 3 months ago
  • 5 points

The 3600x is literally just a factory overclocked 3600. No point in buying that unless you want the fan or the bundle.

Comment reply on imps959's Completed Build: My Daughter's PC (My 2nd Build)

  • 4 months ago
  • 2 points

Are you referring to the 9600kf, because that actually costs more than the regular 9600k. If you are are talking about the 9400f, you are just wrong. The 9400f is not the same performance as the 9600k at all.

Comment reply on capt.iz's Completed Build: My First Build

  • 5 months ago
  • 1 point

How Is the 3600? Idk whether i should get it, the 3700x, or the 9700k

Comment reply on POPPERSHNOZ's Completed Build: My First Custom PC!!!

  • 5 months ago
  • 1 point

It isn't that black and white. The 3600 and 9600k go head and head in gaming with the 9600k winning in some games and the 3600 winning in others, but the 3600 demolishes the 9600k in tasks like decompressing files, streaming, and rendering.

Comment reply on POPPERSHNOZ's Completed Build: My First Custom PC!!!

  • 5 months ago
  • 0 points

I would have gone with an amd 3600 for the processor because it is less expensive and out performs the 9600k in every aspect, including gaming. Depends on the prices in your area, but I also would have gone with the 2080 SUPER because it is the same price as the non-super version in many places, and has a lot better performance and is more future-proof

Comment reply on UFS_Duct_Tape's Completed Build: 1st Build

  • 5 months ago
  • 3 points

You probably just forgot to list the gpu, because if you don't have a dedicated gpu on this build you won't be getting a display on your monitor at all.

Comment reply on aggelioforos's Completed Build: First Ever PC build from scratch

  • 5 months ago
  • 3 points

Probably should have went with the 3600 rather than the 3600x. 50 dollars cheaper with only a 2 percent lower performance.

Comment reply on Slif's Completed Build: Gaming Monster

  • 5 months ago
  • 1 point

You probably should have gone with the 3600 if you wanted a cheap processor. It is more power effecient so you could save on the cooler, it is actually better at gaming, and it excels as a workload cpu which is where the 9600k takes a hit.

Sort

add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube